
Part 2: The Promise vs the Risk
This is the second installment in Part 2 of our 5-part series, where BackBox CEO Rekha Shenoy discusses key questions about the promise versus the risk of AI in networks.
Here, we explore why AI hallucinations, bias, and data quality issues are especially serious in network automation. In network infrastructure, errors or unexpected behaviors can lead to outages or cause security exposures. It's crucial to understand the use case for AI in the network as well as the organization's level of fault tolerance to weigh the risk against your capacity to actively manage and mitigate it.
For more details on using AI for network automation, visit our BackBox Platform Page. Ready to get started? Request a demoto see our solution in action.
Be sure to check out other blogs and videos in this series, including:
Related content
5 Ways AI in Network Operations Is Changing NetOps Right Now
Five concrete ways AI in network operations is changing NetOps today: prioritized vulnerability action, cross-vendor configuration search, fleet-wide fixes and safer automation.
Read Now
Article
NetOps Response to Mythos Lies in Going Back to the Basics
Mythos has shown what the security community has long feared: AI can identify software flaws faster than most organizations can respond.
Read Now
Article
Introducing Kilter AI: Unified AI-Powered Network Cyber Resilience
Introducing Kilter AI, the intelligence layer of the Kilter Platform that transforms network management with AI-powered insights, helping teams enhance sec
Read Now
See for yourself how consistent and reliable your device backups and upgrades can be
Written by
Stephanie Stouck
